thejadegate wrote:In my court hearing yesterday(21/01/16),the question why don't you just ban false and fraudulent sellers, or words to that effect.
james ryan,trademe trust and safety supervisor,said trademe is a business whose goal is to make money and if they banned everyone like that there would be noone left[to sell,and therefore trademe couldnt make money ] or words to that effect.
fairly conclusive statement from someone in a position of authority at tm making a statement in aforum that is 100%recorded and above reproach.
During my case against trademe [admin note: trader's personal details removed] james ryan was forced to disclose what actions trademe hade taken over my formal complaint of [admin note: trader's personal details removed] selling a fake rolex.
james reluctantly admited that trademe policing team had conducted an investigation and concluded that the watch was most likely a counterfiet.
trademe have not banned her, but only given her a warning,one of a three strike-ypur put policy.
she has committed a criminal offence,yet to be prosecuted for,but is still trading on trademe.
the look on james face when hard copy(printout ) of the email thread that conclusivly proves my delivery details WERE sent through to this person was uterly priceless.The thread also clearly displayed the fact that i had attempted to send it to trademe but trademe had refused to process it(for whatever reasons). tjis forced me to courier it to thier wellington office and i have the proof of recipt for that last year.
in a letter courteously provided by james to me dated 13 January 2016,trademe clearly states that i did not provide delivery details to the seller of an auction i won. this means trademe LIED in the document. i only wish that james was under oath at the time as this would constitute purjury and the courts really pursue proven examples of purjury.
this also proves my case 100% against tm but because im such a nasty piece of work when agrivated(my words,not thiers ) i only stan av40-50% chance of winning the case..
james also said that tm tries to maintain a safe environment for traders.
Tm's idea of "safe" obviously does not extend to a fraud free environment.
james also clearly stated that i commited a crime against the ????? telecomunications act(with supporting recording )
this is not at all pissible as a crime is an offence against thw Crimes act only.
I may,or may nit have committed an OFFENCE againat the stated act but i have read and understood the telecomunications act so that i know exactly how far i can push things without committing an offence.
may take james/trademe to rask for defamation for this.
simple matter of court records.
jamescalso mentioned my threatening behaviour to susan clark but the only "threats" made to her are for prosecution in court for counterfieting.
The courts and the law do not deem threats of legal @ction as "THREATS".
Cant wait to file against susan for fraud/counterfieting.
More to follow as it happens.
Case decision reserved for about 21 days.
Why has the traders details been removed.
Somwhere in another thread a poster refused to post details of this nature and site admin(you i think ) clearly stated that it was acceptable to post these details here.
I have and the details are a simple matter of court records (yes,disputes tribunal IS a court in this country )